Introducing validity in fuzzy probability for judicial decision-making
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
ASSOCIATED PROBABILITY INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY WEIGHTED OPERATORS IN BUSINESS START-UP DECISION MAKING
In the study, we propose the Associated Probability Intuitionistic Fuzzy Weighted Averaging (As-P-IFWA) and the Associated Probability Intuitionistic Fuzzy Weighted Geometric (As-P-IFWG) aggregation operators with associated probabilities of a fuzzy measure presenting an uncertainty. Decision makers' evaluations are given as intuitionistic fuzzy values and are used as the arguments of the aggre...
متن کاملCultural Bias in Judicial Decision Making
This Essay describes the phenomenon of cultural bias in judicial decision making, and examines the use of testimonies and opinions of cultural experts as a way to diminish this bias. The Essay compares the legal regimes of the United States and Israel. Whereas in the United States, the general practice of using cultural experts in courts is well developed and regulated, the Israeli legal proced...
متن کاملFuzzy Probability Spaces and Their Applications in Decision Making
In this paper, two types of fuzzy probability spaces will be introduced and their applications in methods of decision making under risk (especially in the Decision Matrix Method) will be described. First, a fuzzy probability space that generalizes the classical probability space (<,Bn, p) to the situation of fuzzy random events will be studied. It will be applied to perform fuzzy discretization...
متن کاملDecision Making for Symbolic Probability
This paper proposes a decision theory for a symbolic generalization of probability theory (SP). Darwiche and Ginsberg [2, 3] proposed SP to relax the requirement of using numbers for uncertainty while preserving desirable patterns of Bayesian reasoning. SP represents uncertainty by symbolic supports that are ordered partially rather than completely as in the case of standard probability. We sho...
متن کاملGender, Critical Mass, and Judicial Decision Making
We examine the role of gender in legal decision making by applying critical mass theory to the U.S. federal district courts. We analyze whether behavioral differences manifest themselves in the decision-making proclivities of male and female judges, contingent on the existence of a critical mass of female judges at a court point (i.e., each city in which a district court is located). Our result...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
سال: 2014
ISSN: 0888-613X
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2013.12.003